Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests

Feds Nix Two Tribal Gaming Compacts, Gov. Gavin Newsom Protests.

Costfoto / NurPhoto / Getty Images

Key Takeaways

The US Department of the Interior decided not to approve Class III gaming compacts with two California tribes — the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria and the Middletown Rancheria of Pomo Indians — claiming that they violated portions of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.

Tachi Palace Casino ResortThe Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif, seen above. The federal government recently denied two compacts signed by the State of California, including one with the Santa Rosa Indian Community of the Santa Rosa Rancheria to expand their resort. (Image: tachipalace.com)

Both tribes were reportedly planning a “casino resort complex,” according to rejection letters sent to the tribes and the state. These plans include building new restaurants and hotels that operate beyond the gaming spaces regulated by the Tribe’s Gaming Commission.

Taking issue with several definitions in the compacts, the feds wrote, The 2022 compact confers expansive powers on the state and local governments to regulate the tribe’s activities and lands that are not directly related to the actual conduct of gaming.”

State-tribal Class III gaming compacts are agreements between the state and separate tribal governments that specify how many gaming devices and casinos a single tribe can operate, according to the Tribal Alliance of Sovereign Indian Nations.

The Santa Rosa Rancheria had planned to expand the gaming space in their Tachi Palace Casino Resort in Lemoore, Calif. by 44,000 square feet and build a 12-room hotel tower, a bingo hall/conference center, and a three-level garage.

Newsom Slams Decision

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) strongly rebuked the feds’ decision, warning of its repercussions. He said in a statement that the disapprovals Threaten the ability of these and other tribes to invest and maintain jobs in many of California’s economically disadvantaged communities.

He noted that the compacts were “carefully negotiated by the state and the tribes in compliance with the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act” to give tribes the “economic benefits of gaming while mitigating impacts to local communities.” And he noted that this latest agreement came on top of existing compacts signed between the tribes and the state in 1999.

This is the second time the Interior Department has disapproved of compacts with the same tribes, following a similar decision in November 2021.

California has ratified gaming compacts with 75 tribes, and currently hosts 66 casinos operated by 63 tribes, according to the California Gambling Control Commission.

Article Sources
New York Casino Licenses Could Be Awarded in 2025 editorial policy.
  1. GVC Hit with £5.9 Million Fine Over Ladbrokes Coral Past Transgressions

Compare Accounts
×
VEGAS MYTHS RE-BUSTED: Elvis Presley Didn’t Die on Aug. 16, 1977
Provider
Name
Description
Montana Tribal Casino Authorized to Relocate to Annexed Land in Polson  North Goa India Airport May Land Casinos, But Only for Airline Passengers  MGM Resorts Launches Ad Campaign Attacking Connecticut Airport Casino  Jury Mulls Case of Chinese Billionaire Accused of LA Councilman Casino-Chip Bribery  Alabama Lottery Vote Narrowly Passes State House, Governor Bentley Denies Secret Casino Plans  Same Old Jets? Giants Lose on Final Play? New York Football Fans Dread Debuts  Who Pushed Their Luck a Little Too Far in 2017: A Look Back  Signature Deadline Approaching to Authorize Nebraska Casino Vote in November  Atlantic City Casino Property Tax Adjustment Violates 2018 Consent Order, Judge Rules  Disney Investor Daniel Loeb Changes Mind on ESPN Spinoff